↓ Skip to main content

The Astronomical Orientation of Ancient Greek Temples

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Astronomical Orientation of Ancient Greek Temples
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007903
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alun M. Salt

Abstract

Despite its appearing to be a simple question to answer, there has been no consensus as to whether or not the alignments of ancient Greek temples reflect astronomical intentions. Here I present the results of a survey of archaic and classical Greek temples in Sicily and compare them with temples in Greece. Using a binomial test I show strong evidence that there is a preference for solar orientations. I then speculate that differences in alignment patterns between Sicily and Greece reflect differing pressures in the expression of ethnic identity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Professor 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 9 28%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 14 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2017.
All research outputs
#642,820
of 24,417,324 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#8,825
of 210,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,146
of 173,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#23
of 554 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 554 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.