↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing nutritional environments through access to fruit and vegetables in schools and homes among children and youth: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancing nutritional environments through access to fruit and vegetables in schools and homes among children and youth: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Research Notes, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-422
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Ganann, Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Donna Ciliska, Leslea J Peirson, Rachel L Warren, Paul Fieldhouse, Mario F Delgado-Noguera, Sera Tort, Steven P Hams, Maria José Martinez-Zapata, Luke Wolfenden

Abstract

Low fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption is one of the top 10 global risk factors for mortality, and is related to increased risk for cancer, cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Many environmental, sociodemographic and personal factors affect FV consumption. The purpose of this review is to examine the effects of interventions delivered in the home, school and other nutritional environments designed to increase FV availability for five to 18-year olds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 229 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 22%
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 46 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 16%
Social Sciences 25 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 10%
Psychology 23 10%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 53 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,103,119
of 24,552,012 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#782
of 4,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,147
of 232,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#30
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,552,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.