You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of improving sleep on mental health (OASIS): a randomised controlled trial with mediation analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
"The Lancet Psychiatry", September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30328-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Freeman, Bryony Sheaves, Guy M Goodwin, Ly-Mee Yu, Alecia Nickless, Paul J Harrison, Richard Emsley, Annemarie I Luik, Russell G Foster, Vanashree Wadekar, Christopher Hinds, Andrew Gumley, Ray Jones, Stafford Lightman, Steve Jones, Richard Bentall, Peter Kinderman, Georgina Rowse, Traolach Brugha, Mark Blagrove, Alice M Gregory, Leanne Fleming, Elaine Walklet, Cris Glazebrook, E Bethan Davies, Chris Hollis, Gillian Haddock, Bev John, Mark Coulson, David Fowler, Katherine Pugh, John Cape, Peter Moseley, Gary Brown, Claire Hughes, Marc Obonsawin, Sian Coker, Edward Watkins, Matthias Schwannauer, Kenneth MacMahon, A Niroshan Siriwardena, Colin A Espie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 793 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 180 | 23% |
| United States | 102 | 13% |
| Australia | 43 | 5% |
| Spain | 28 | 4% |
| Canada | 26 | 3% |
| Brazil | 12 | 2% |
| Ireland | 12 | 2% |
| Germany | 11 | 1% |
| Mexico | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 92 | 12% |
| Unknown | 279 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 472 | 60% |
| Scientists | 175 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 133 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,059 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1059 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 151 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 120 | 11% |
| Researcher | 109 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 101 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 63 | 6% |
| Other | 192 | 18% |
| Unknown | 323 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 252 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 86 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 41 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 3% |
| Other | 143 | 14% |
| Unknown | 374 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1244. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#11,383
of 25,934,828 outputs
Outputs from "The Lancet Psychiatry"
#26
of 2,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148
of 327,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from "The Lancet Psychiatry"
#1
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.