You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Major transitions in the evolution of early land plants: a bryological perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aob/mcs017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberto Ligrone, Jeffrey G. Duckett, Karen S. Renzaglia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 8 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 1% |
| Unknown | 395 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 18% |
| Researcher | 72 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 13% |
| Professor | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 72 | 17% |
| Unknown | 68 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 251 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Unknown | 77 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#2,276
of 3,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,512
of 172,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.