↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating chronic ankle instability

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating chronic ankle instability
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004124.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasper S de Vries, Rover Krips, Inger N Sierevelt, Leendert Blankevoort, C N van Dijk

Abstract

Chronic lateral ankle instability occurs in 10% to 20% of people after an acute ankle sprain. Initial treatment is conservative but if this fails and ligament laxity is present, surgical intervention is considered.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 318 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 22%
Student > Bachelor 71 21%
Student > Postgraduate 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 9%
Other 71 21%
Unknown 25 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 19%
Sports and Recreations 30 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 38 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,820,347
of 15,037,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,953
of 11,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,305
of 96,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,037,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.