↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of the vaginal microbiota of healthy Canadian women through the menstrual cycle

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
2 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
193 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of the vaginal microbiota of healthy Canadian women through the menstrual cycle
Published in
Microbiome, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/2049-2618-2-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bonnie Chaban, Matthew G Links, Teenus Paramel Jayaprakash, Emily C Wagner, Danielle K Bourque, Zoe Lohn, Arianne YK Albert, Julie van Schalkwyk, Gregor Reid, Sean M Hemmingsen, Janet E Hill, Deborah M Money

Abstract

The vaginal microbial community plays a vital role in maintaining women's health. Understanding the precise bacterial composition is challenging because of the diverse and difficult-to-culture nature of many bacterial constituents, necessitating culture-independent methodology. During a natural menstrual cycle, physiological changes could have an impact on bacterial growth, colonization, and community structure. The objective of this study was to assess the stability of the vaginal microbiome of healthy Canadian women throughout a menstrual cycle by using cpn60-based microbiota analysis. Vaginal swabs from 27 naturally cycling reproductive-age women were collected weekly through a single menstrual cycle. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to amplify the universal target region of the cpn60 gene and generate amplicons representative of the microbial community. Amplicons were pyrosequenced, assembled into operational taxonomic units, and analyzed. Samples were also assayed for total 16S rRNA gene content and Gardnerella vaginalis by quantitative PCR and screened for the presence of Mollicutes by using family and genus-specific PCR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 291 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 16%
Student > Master 46 15%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 55 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 30 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 1%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 71 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,211,061
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,357
of 1,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,750
of 242,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.