↓ Skip to main content

Corticosteroids for dengue infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corticosteroids for dengue infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003488.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fan Zhang, Christine V Kramer

Abstract

Dengue is a common and important mosquito-borne viral infection. In many low- and middle-income countries it is endemic and is an important public health problem. Severe dengue is an important cause of death in children. There is no specific treatment for dengue, but observational studies suggest corticosteroids may have a benefit in dengue-related shock, and some people believe corticosteroids may prevent the progression to severe illness if given early in the course of the illness.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 257 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 20%
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 66 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 72 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#5,533,187
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,376
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,571
of 226,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.