You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of a health coaching self-management program for older adults with multimorbidity in nursing homes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s62411 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yeon-Hwan Park, HeeKyung Chang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 20% |
| Unknown | 45 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 18% |
| Psychology | 17 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2017.
All research outputs
#5,272,837
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#370
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,014
of 242,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.