↓ Skip to main content

Incidence and outcomes of neonatal acute kidney injury (AWAKEN): a multicentre, multinational, observational cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
68 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incidence and outcomes of neonatal acute kidney injury (AWAKEN): a multicentre, multinational, observational cohort study
Published in
The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/s2352-4642(17)30069-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer G Jetton, Louis J Boohaker, Sidharth K Sethi, Sanjay Wazir, Smriti Rohatgi, Danielle E Soranno, Aftab S Chishti, Robert Woroniecki, Cherry Mammen, Jonathan R Swanson, Shanthy Sridhar, Craig S Wong, Juan C Kupferman, Russell L Griffin, David J Askenazi, Neonatal Kidney Collaborative, David T Selewski, Subrata Sarkar, Alison Kent, Jeffery Fletcher, Carolyn L Abitbol, Marissa DeFreitas, Shahnaz Duara, Jennifer R Charlton, Ronnie Guillet, Carl D'Angio, Ayesa Mian, Erin Rademacher, Maroun J Mhanna, Rupesh Raina, Deepak Kumar, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Ayse Akcan Arikan, Christopher J Rhee, Stuart L Goldstein, Amy T Nathan, Alok Bhutada, Shantanu Rastogi, Elizabeth Bonachea, Susan Ingraham, John Mahan, Arwa Nada, Patrick D Brophy, Tarah T Colaizy, Jonathan M Klein, F Sessions Cole, T Keefe Davis, Joshua Dower, Lawrence Milner, Alexandra Smith, Mamta Fuloria, Kimberly Reidy, Frederick J Kaskel, Jason Gien, Katja M Gist, Mina H Hanna, Sangeeta Hingorani, Michelle Starr, Catherine Joseph, Tara DuPont, Robin Ohls, Amy Staples, Surender Khokhar, Sofia Perazzo, Patricio E Ray, Mary Revenis, Anne Synnes, Pia Wintermark

Abstract

Single-center studies suggest that neonatal acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with poor outcomes. However, inferences regarding the association between AKI, mortality, and hospital length of stay are limited due to the small sample size of those studies. In order to determine whether neonatal AKI is independently associated with increased mortality and longer hospital stay, we analyzed the Assessment of Worldwide Acute Kidney Epidemiology in Neonates (AWAKEN) database. All neonates admitted to 24 participating neonatal intensive care units from four countries (Australia, Canada, India, United States) between January 1 and March 31, 2014, were screened. Of 4273 neonates screened, 2022 (47·3%) met study criteria. Exclusion criteria included: no intravenous fluids ≥48 hours, admission ≥14 days of life, congenital heart disease requiring surgical repair at <7 days of life, lethal chromosomal anomaly, death within 48 hours, inability to determine AKI status or severe congenital kidney abnormalities. AKI was defined using a standardized definition -i.e., serum creatinine rise of ≥0.3 mg/dL (26.5 mcmol/L) or ≥50% from previous lowest value, and/or if urine output was <1 mL/kg/h on postnatal days 2 to 7. Incidence of AKI was 605/2022 (29·9%). Rates varied by gestational age groups (i.e., ≥22 to <29 weeks =47·9%; ≥29 to <36 weeks =18·3%; and ≥36 weeks =36·7%). Even after adjusting for multiple potential confounding factors, infants with AKI had higher mortality compared to those without AKI [(59/605 (9·7%) vs. 20/1417 (1·4%); p< 0.001; adjusted OR=4·6 (95% CI=2·5-8·3); p=<0·0001], and longer hospital stay [adjusted parameter estimate 8·8 days (95% CI=6·1-11·5); p<0·0001]. Neonatal AKI is a common and independent risk factor for mortality and longer hospital stay. These data suggest that neonates may be impacted by AKI in a manner similar to pediatric and adult patients. US National Institutes of Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Cincinnati Children's, University of New Mexico.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 294 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 33 11%
Student > Postgraduate 32 11%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 5%
Other 55 19%
Unknown 110 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 43%
Psychology 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 1%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 126 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2024.
All research outputs
#495,901
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
#178
of 1,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,475
of 344,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
#4
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 94.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.