↓ Skip to main content

Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001298.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gaity Ahmad, Fiona L Mackie, David A Iles, Helena O'Flynn, Sofia Dias, Mostafa Metwally, Andrew Watson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 153 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 11 7%
Other 40 26%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 28 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,070,191
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,448
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,107
of 188,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.