↓ Skip to main content

Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
16 blogs
twitter
410 X users
weibo
2 weibo users
facebook
21 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
reddit
5 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
citeulike
11 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0101698
Pubmed ID
Authors

John P. A. Ioannidis, Kevin W. Boyack, Richard Klavans

Abstract

The ability of a scientist to maintain a continuous stream of publication may be important, because research requires continuity of effort. However, there is no data on what proportion of scientists manages to publish each and every year over long periods of time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 410 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 4%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Canada 4 1%
Germany 3 1%
Netherlands 3 1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 248 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 58 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 20%
Professor 28 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 27 9%
Student > Master 27 9%
Other 67 23%
Unknown 24 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 19%
Social Sciences 38 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 10%
Computer Science 20 7%
Environmental Science 17 6%
Other 93 32%
Unknown 36 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 453. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#62,250
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,056
of 224,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#445
of 241,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#22
of 4,629 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,629 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.