You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Towards personalized integrated dementia care: a qualitative study into the implementation of different models of case management
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-14-84 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lisa D Van Mierlo, Franka JM Meiland, Hein PJ Van Hout, Rose-Marie Dröes |
Abstract |
The aim of this process evaluation was to provide insight into facilitators and barriers to the delivery of community-based personalized dementia care of two different case management models, i.e. the linkage model and the combined intensive case management/joint agency model. These two emerging dementia care models differ considerably in the way they are organized and implemented. Insight into facilitators and barriers in the implementation of different models is needed to create future guidelines for successful implementation of case management in other regions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 72 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 20% |
Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
Librarian | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 15 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 12 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 11% |
Computer Science | 5 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2014.
All research outputs
#14,027,062
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,104
of 3,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,931
of 228,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.