↓ Skip to main content

Daily sedation interruption versus no daily sedation interruption for critically ill adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Daily sedation interruption versus no daily sedation interruption for critically ill adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009176.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Burry, Louise Rose, Iain J McCullagh, Dean A Fergusson, Niall D Ferguson, Sangeeta Mehta

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Finland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 263 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 19%
Researcher 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Postgraduate 22 8%
Other 64 23%
Unknown 39 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 17%
Psychology 10 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 49 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#851,662
of 14,389,085 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,575
of 10,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,890
of 188,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,389,085 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.