↓ Skip to main content

Daily sedation interruption versus no daily sedation interruption for critically ill adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Daily sedation interruption versus no daily sedation interruption for critically ill adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009176.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Burry, Louise Rose, Iain J McCullagh, Dean A Fergusson, Niall D Ferguson, Sangeeta Mehta

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Finland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 349 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 18%
Researcher 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 38 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Other 29 8%
Other 84 23%
Unknown 62 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 172 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 15%
Psychology 15 4%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 75 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#994,944
of 16,038,550 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,742
of 11,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,355
of 190,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,038,550 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.