↓ Skip to main content

Towards a Pathogenic Escherichia coli Detection Platform Using Multiplex SYBR®Green Real-Time PCR Methods and High Resolution Melting Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards a Pathogenic Escherichia coli Detection Platform Using Multiplex SYBR®Green Real-Time PCR Methods and High Resolution Melting Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039287
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dafni-Maria Kagkli, Silvia Folloni, Elodie Barbau-Piednoir, Guy Van den Eede, Marc Van den Bulcke

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 86 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Postgraduate 11 12%
Student > Master 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Other 24 26%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,630,234
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#92,430
of 198,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,439
of 165,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,605
of 3,959 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,959 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.