You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pectoralis major tendon repair: a biomechanical study of suture button versus transosseous suture techniques
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-014-3008-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William Thomas, Sabina Gheduzzi, Iain Packham |
| Abstract |
Pectoralis major tendon avulsion injury benefits from surgical repair. The technique used and speed of rehabilitation in this demanding population remains subject to debate. We performed a biomechanical study comparing suture button (Pec Button™, Arthrex, Naples, FL) with a transosseous suture technique (FibreWire, Arthrex, Naples, FL). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 24% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 38% |
| Engineering | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,560,697
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,627
of 2,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,180
of 228,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#32
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.