↓ Skip to main content

Next Generation Sequencing Provides Rapid Access to the Genome of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, the Causal Agent of Wheat Stripe Rust

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Next Generation Sequencing Provides Rapid Access to the Genome of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, the Causal Agent of Wheat Stripe Rust
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0024230
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dario Cantu, Manjula Govindarajulu, Alex Kozik, Meinan Wang, Xianming Chen, Kenji K. Kojima, Jerzy Jurka, Richard W. Michelmore, Jorge Dubcovsky

Abstract

The wheat stripe rust fungus (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, PST) is responsible for significant yield losses in wheat production worldwide. In spite of its economic importance, the PST genomic sequence is not currently available. Fortunately Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has radically improved sequencing speed and efficiency with a great reduction in costs compared to traditional sequencing technologies. We used Illumina sequencing to rapidly access the genomic sequence of the highly virulent PST race 130 (PST-130).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 193 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 29%
Researcher 47 22%
Student > Master 34 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Student > Bachelor 8 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 19 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 141 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 <1%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 26 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2012.
All research outputs
#5,163,855
of 25,161,628 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#83,006
of 218,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,449
of 129,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#629
of 2,541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,161,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.