You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Next Generation Sequencing Provides Rapid Access to the Genome of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, the Causal Agent of Wheat Stripe Rust
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0024230 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dario Cantu, Manjula Govindarajulu, Alex Kozik, Meinan Wang, Xianming Chen, Kenji K. Kojima, Jerzy Jurka, Richard W. Michelmore, Jorge Dubcovsky |
Abstract |
The wheat stripe rust fungus (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, PST) is responsible for significant yield losses in wheat production worldwide. In spite of its economic importance, the PST genomic sequence is not currently available. Fortunately Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has radically improved sequencing speed and efficiency with a great reduction in costs compared to traditional sequencing technologies. We used Illumina sequencing to rapidly access the genomic sequence of the highly virulent PST race 130 (PST-130). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 15% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
India | 1 | 8% |
France | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 8 | 62% |
Members of the public | 3 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 1% |
Unknown | 193 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 29% |
Researcher | 47 | 22% |
Student > Master | 34 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 4% |
Other | 29 | 14% |
Unknown | 19 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 141 | 67% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 12% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 1% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | <1% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | <1% |
Other | 10 | 5% |
Unknown | 26 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2012.
All research outputs
#5,163,855
of 25,161,628 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#83,006
of 218,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,449
of 129,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#629
of 2,541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,161,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.