↓ Skip to main content

Combination of tocolytic agents for inhibiting preterm labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combination of tocolytic agents for inhibiting preterm labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006169.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua P Vogel, Juan Manuel Nardin, Therese Dowswell, Helen M West, Olufemi T Oladapo

Abstract

Preterm birth represents the single largest cause of mortality and morbidity for newborns and a major cause of morbidity for pregnant women. Tocolytic agents include a wide range of drugs that can inhibit labour to prolong pregnancy. This may gain time to allow the fetus to mature further before being born, permit antenatal corticosteroid administration for lung maturation, and allow time for intra-uterine transfer to a hospital with neonatal intensive care facilities. However, some tocolytic drugs are associated with severe side effects. Combinations of tocolytic drugs may be more effective over single tocolytic agents or no intervention, without adversely affecting the mother or neonate.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 164 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 25%
Researcher 27 16%
Unspecified 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 39 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 50%
Unspecified 35 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 23 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2015.
All research outputs
#1,938,193
of 13,375,725 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,629
of 10,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,998
of 187,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,375,725 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.