You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Childhood Undernutrition in India: Analyzing Trends between 1992 and 2005
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0011392 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Malavika A. Subramanyam, Ichiro Kawachi, Lisa F. Berkman, S. V. Subramanian |
| Abstract |
India experienced a rapid economic boom between 1991 and 2007. However, this economic growth has not translated into improved nutritional status among young Indian children. Additionally, no study has assessed the trends in social disparities in childhood undernutrition in the Indian context. We examined the trends in social disparities in underweight and stunting among Indian children aged less than three years using nationally representative data. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 16% |
| Researcher | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 20 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2014.
All research outputs
#1,694,109
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#21,925
of 194,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,842
of 93,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#110
of 719 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 719 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.