↓ Skip to main content

Optimal sampling of seeds from plant populations for ex-situ conservation of genetic biodiversity, considering realistic population structure

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Optimal sampling of seeds from plant populations for ex-situ conservation of genetic biodiversity, considering realistic population structure
Published in
Biological Conservation, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.014
Authors

Sean Hoban, Scott Schlarbaum

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Mexico 2 3%
France 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 54 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 37%
Student > Master 19 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 76%
Environmental Science 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2015.
All research outputs
#125,280
of 8,012,329 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#66
of 2,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,641
of 178,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,012,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.