↓ Skip to main content

Genome-Scale Analysis of Translation Elongation with a Ribosome Flow Model

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-Scale Analysis of Translation Elongation with a Ribosome Flow Model
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shlomi Reuveni, Isaac Meilijson, Martin Kupiec, Eytan Ruppin, Tamir Tuller

Abstract

We describe the first large scale analysis of gene translation that is based on a model that takes into account the physical and dynamical nature of this process. The Ribosomal Flow Model (RFM) predicts fundamental features of the translation process, including translation rates, protein abundance levels, ribosomal densities and the relation between all these variables, better than alternative ('non-physical') approaches. In addition, we show that the RFM can be used for accurate inference of various other quantities including genes' initiation rates and translation costs. These quantities could not be inferred by previous predictors. We find that increasing the number of available ribosomes (or equivalently the initiation rate) increases the genomic translation rate and the mean ribosome density only up to a certain point, beyond which both saturate. Strikingly, assuming that the translation system is tuned to work at the pre-saturation point maximizes the predictive power of the model with respect to experimental data. This result suggests that in all organisms that were analyzed (from bacteria to Human), the global initiation rate is optimized to attain the pre-saturation point. The fact that similar results were not observed for heterologous genes indicates that this feature is under selection. Remarkably, the gap between the performance of the RFM and alternative predictors is strikingly large in the case of heterologous genes, testifying to the model's promising biotechnological value in predicting the abundance of heterologous proteins before expressing them in the desired host.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 6%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Germany 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 175 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 29%
Researcher 52 26%
Student > Master 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 24%
Engineering 10 5%
Mathematics 9 5%
Computer Science 8 4%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 26 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2011.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,953
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,990
of 136,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#74
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.