You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Linkage to HIV Care and Antiretroviral Therapy in Cape Town, South Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0013801 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katharina Kranzer, Jennifer Zeinecker, Philip Ginsberg, Catherine Orrell, Nosindiso N. Kalawe, Stephen D. Lawn, Linda-Gail Bekker, Robin Wood |
| Abstract |
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been scaled-up rapidly in Africa. Programme reports typically focus on loss to follow-up and mortality among patients receiving ART. However, little is known about linkage and retention in care of individuals prior to starting ART. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Sudan | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 263 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 69 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 56 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 142 | 51% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,912,787
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#38,758
of 194,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,148
of 100,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#233
of 972 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 972 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.