↓ Skip to main content

What rheumatologists in the United States think of complementary and alternative medicine: results of a national survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What rheumatologists in the United States think of complementary and alternative medicine: results of a national survey
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-10-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nisha J Manek, Cynthia S Crowson, Abigale L Ottenberg, Farr A Curlin, Ted J Kaptchuk, Jon C Tilburt

Abstract

We aimed to describe prevailing attitudes and practices of rheumatologists in the United States toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatments. We wanted to determine whether rheumatologists' perceptions of the efficacy of CAM therapies and their willingness to recommend them relate to their demographic characteristics, geographic location, or clinical practices.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Norway 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 63 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Other 18 27%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 37%
Psychology 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,233,066
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2,969
of 3,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,591
of 164,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.