You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Lithium-induced nephrotic syndrome in a young pediatric patient
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pediatric Nephrology, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00467-001-0809-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Abdullah Sakarcan, David B. Thomas, Kevin P. O’Reilly, Robert W. Richards |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 19% |
Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 75% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2014.
All research outputs
#5,833,144
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#989
of 3,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,400
of 220,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#12
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,534 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.