You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rapid recolonisation by the European red fox: how effective are uncoordinated and isolated control programs?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-014-0844-x |
| Authors |
Thomas M. Newsome, Mathew S. Crowther, Christopher R. Dickman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,853,033
of 23,957,285 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#305
of 972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,327
of 230,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,957,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.