↓ Skip to main content

Barriers, motivators and facilitators related to prenatal care utilization among inner-city women in Winnipeg, Canada: a case–control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barriers, motivators and facilitators related to prenatal care utilization among inner-city women in Winnipeg, Canada: a case–control study
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maureen I Heaman, Michael Moffatt, Lawrence Elliott, Wendy Sword, Michael E Helewa, Heather Morris, Patricia Gregory, Lynda Tjaden, Catherine Cook

Abstract

The reasons why women do not obtain prenatal care even when it is available and accessible are complex. Despite Canada's universally funded health care system, use of prenatal care varies widely across neighborhoods in Winnipeg, Manitoba, with the highest rates of inadequate prenatal care found in eight inner-city neighborhoods. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers, motivators and facilitators related to use of prenatal care among women living in these inner-city neighborhoods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 238 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 26%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 51 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 17%
Social Sciences 23 10%
Psychology 16 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 65 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,819,884
of 23,460,553 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,357
of 4,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,665
of 228,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#34
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,460,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.