↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative study of developmental biology confirms Dickinsonia as a metazoan

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
49 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative study of developmental biology confirms Dickinsonia as a metazoan
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2017
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2017.1348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renee S. Hoekzema, Martin D. Brasier, Frances S. Dunn, Alexander G. Liu

Abstract

The late Ediacaran soft-bodied macroorganism Dickinsonia (age range approx. 560-550 Ma) has often been interpreted as an early animal, and is increasingly invoked in debate on the evolutionary assembly of eumetazoan body plans. However, conclusive positive evidence in support of such a phylogenetic affinity has not been forthcoming. Here we subject a collection of Dickinsonia specimens interpreted to represent multiple ontogenetic stages to a novel, quantitative method for studying growth and development in organisms with an iterative body plan. Our study demonstrates that Dickinsonia grew via pre-terminal 'deltoidal' insertion and inflation of constructional units, followed by a later inflation-dominated phase of growth. This growth model is contrary to the widely held assumption that Dickinsonia grew via terminal addition of units at the end of the organism bearing the smallest units. When considered alongside morphological and behavioural attributes, our developmental data phylogenetically constrain Dickinsonia to the Metazoa, specifically the Eumetazoa plus Placozoa total group. Our findings have implications for the use of Dickinsonia in developmental debates surrounding the metazoan acquisition of axis specification and metamerism.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 21%
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 5 8%
Professor 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 16%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2022.
All research outputs
#311,117
of 24,396,012 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#770
of 10,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,872
of 320,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#21
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,396,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.