You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Preventing the Reintroduction of Malaria in Mauritius: A Programmatic and Financial Assessment
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0023832 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Allison Tatarsky, Shahina Aboobakar, Justin M. Cohen, Neerunjun Gopee, Ambicadutt Bheecarry, Devanand Moonasar, Allison A. Phillips, James G. Kahn, Bruno Moonen, David L. Smith, Oliver Sabot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 67% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 101 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
Researcher | 16 | 15% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
Other | 26 | 25% |
Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 17% |
Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,190,630
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#26,552
of 224,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,382
of 136,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#288
of 2,558 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,558 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.