You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The 4D nucleome project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature23884 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Job Dekker, Andrew S. Belmont, Mitchell Guttman, Victor O. Leshyk, John T. Lis, Stavros Lomvardas, Leonid A. Mirny, Clodagh C. O’Shea, Peter J. Park, Bing Ren, Joan C. Ritland Politz, Jay Shendure, Sheng Zhong |
| Abstract |
The 4D Nucleome Network aims to develop and apply approaches to map the structure and dynamics of the human and mouse genomes in space and time with the goal of gaining deeper mechanistic insights into how the nucleus is organized and functions. The project will develop and benchmark experimental and computational approaches for measuring genome conformation and nuclear organization, and investigate how these contribute to gene regulation and other genome functions. Validated experimental technologies will be combined with biophysical approaches to generate quantitative models of spatial genome organization in different biological states, both in cell populations and in single cells. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 327 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 75 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 6% |
| France | 13 | 4% |
| Spain | 11 | 3% |
| India | 10 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 2% |
| Brazil | 6 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 1% |
| Sweden | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 51 | 16% |
| Unknown | 126 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 174 | 53% |
| Scientists | 132 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 915 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 911 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 236 | 26% |
| Researcher | 176 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 86 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 9% |
| Professor | 36 | 4% |
| Other | 117 | 13% |
| Unknown | 182 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 378 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 169 | 18% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 29 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 28 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 2% |
| Other | 95 | 10% |
| Unknown | 194 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 205. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#193,939
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#11,614
of 98,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,072
of 324,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#230
of 878 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 878 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.