↓ Skip to main content

Long-acting beta2-agonists for poorly reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-acting beta2-agonists for poorly reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001104.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Appleton, Phillippa Poole, Brian J Smith, Antony Veale, Toby J Lasserson, Matthew Ming Ki Chan, Christopher J Cates

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 28%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Unspecified 8 10%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 57%
Unspecified 10 12%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,056,795
of 12,963,687 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,854
of 10,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,714
of 192,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,963,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.