You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Endovascular treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005261.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Badger S, Bedenis R, Blair PH, Ellis P, Kee F, Harkin DW, Badger, Stephen, Bedenis, Rachel, Blair, Paul H, Ellis, Peter, Kee, Frank, Harkin, Denis W |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
Researcher | 11 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 51% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,100,754
of 24,764,450 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,907
of 12,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,261
of 234,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#146
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,764,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.