You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Slow versus fast subcutaneous heparin injections for prevention of bruising and site-pain intensity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008077.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Akbari Sari A, Janani L, Mohammady M, Nedjat S |
Abstract |
Heparin is an anticoagulant medication that is normally injected subcutaneously. Subcutaneous administration of heparin may result in complications such as bruising, haematoma and pain at the injection site. One of the factors that may affect pain, haematoma and bruising is injection speed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 44% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 22% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Psychology | 2 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,183,511
of 24,178,331 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,068
of 12,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,395
of 208,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,178,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.