↓ Skip to main content

Avaliabilidade do Programa Academia da Saúde no Município do Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avaliabilidade do Programa Academia da Saúde no Município do Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, May 2017
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00159415
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafaela Niels da Silva, Flávio Renato Barros da Guarda, Pedro Curi Hallal, Petrônio José de Lima Martelli

Abstract

Implementation of the Health Gym Program is one of the key strategies in the Brazilian National Health Promotion Policy, but thus far no evaluability studies have been performed on this intervention in Recife, Pernambuco State, one of the first cities in the country to implement this intervention. This study aimed to measure the evaluability of the Health Gym Program in the city of Recife, based on the description of the intervention and the elaboration of its log frame model and theoretical models for evaluation, in addition to identifying evaluative questions. A qualitative approach was used, based on a seven-element system, by document research, interviews, and discussion with the program's managers and staff, as well as the condensation of meanings technique for analysis of the documents and interviews. The analysis showed that the program has a wide range of objectives, principles, and guidelines, and that part of the management ignores such elements. After modeling the program, the study showed the methodological and operational feasibility for the development of an evaluative survey that was discussed and negotiated with managers and workers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 18 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Psychology 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 19 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1,564
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,197
of 326,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#31
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.