↓ Skip to main content

Mothers After Gestational Diabetes in Australia Diabetes Prevention Program (MAGDA-DPP) post-natal intervention: an update to the study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mothers After Gestational Diabetes in Australia Diabetes Prevention Program (MAGDA-DPP) post-natal intervention: an update to the study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-259
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophy TF Shih, Nathalie Davis-Lameloise, Edward D Janus, Carol Wildey, Vincent L Versace, Virginia Hagger, Dino Asproloupos, Sharleen L O’Reilly, Paddy A Phillips, Michael Ackland, Timothy Skinner, Jeremy Oats, Rob Carter, James D Best, James A Dunbar

Abstract

The Mothers After Gestational Diabetes in Australia Diabetes Prevention Program (MAGDA-DPP) is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that aims to assess the effectiveness of a structured diabetes prevention intervention for women who had gestational diabetes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 157 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Student > Bachelor 27 17%
Researcher 22 14%
Unspecified 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Other 39 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 32%
Unspecified 29 18%
Psychology 22 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Other 26 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#10,039,013
of 12,547,386 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#2,531
of 3,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,376
of 192,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,547,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.