↓ Skip to main content

Mothers After Gestational Diabetes in Australia Diabetes Prevention Program (MAGDA-DPP) post-natal intervention: an update to the study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mothers After Gestational Diabetes in Australia Diabetes Prevention Program (MAGDA-DPP) post-natal intervention: an update to the study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-259
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shih ST, Davis-Lameloise N, Janus ED, Wildey C, Versace VL, Hagger V, Asproloupos D, O Reilly SL, Phillips PA, Ackland M, Skinner T, Oats J, Carter R, Best JD, Dunbar JA, Sophy TF Shih, Nathalie Davis-Lameloise, Edward D Janus, Carol Wildey, Vincent L Versace, Virginia Hagger, Dino Asproloupos, Sharleen L O’Reilly, Paddy A Phillips, Michael Ackland, Timothy Skinner, Jeremy Oats, Rob Carter, James D Best, James A Dunbar

Abstract

The Mothers After Gestational Diabetes in Australia Diabetes Prevention Program (MAGDA-DPP) is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that aims to assess the effectiveness of a structured diabetes prevention intervention for women who had gestational diabetes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 32 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 34%
Psychology 17 14%
Unspecified 14 12%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Other 25 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,724,391
of 6,393,734 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,459
of 1,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,009
of 137,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#83
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,393,734 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.