↓ Skip to main content

Urinating Standing versus Sitting: Position Is of Influence in Men with Prostate Enlargement. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
60 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
191 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
35 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urinating Standing versus Sitting: Position Is of Influence in Men with Prostate Enlargement. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0101320
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ype de Jong, Johannes Henricus Francisca Maria Pinckaers, Robin Marco ten Brinck, Augustinus Aizo Beent Lycklama à Nijeholt, Olaf Matthijs Dekkers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 191 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Other 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 24 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 30 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 622. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#36,961
of 25,916,093 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#618
of 226,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230
of 240,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#16
of 4,804 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,916,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,804 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.