You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protective Effects of Panax Notoginseng Saponins on Cardiovascular Diseases: A Comprehensive Overview of Experimental Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1155/2014/204840 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaochen Yang, Xingjiang Xiong, Heran Wang, Jie Wang |
| Abstract |
Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS) are one of the most important compounds derived from roots of the herb Panax notoginseng which are traditionally used as a hemostatic medicine to control internal and external bleeding in China for thousands of years. To date, at least twenty saponins were identified and some of them including notoginsenoside R1, ginsenoside Rb1, and ginsenoside Rg1 were researched frequently in the area of cardiovascular protection. However, the protective effects of PNS on cardiovascular diseases based on experimental studies and its underlying mechanisms have not been reviewed systematically. This paper reviewed the pharmacology of PNS and its monomers Rb1, Rg1, and R1 in the treatment for cardiovascular diseases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,116,833
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#4,654
of 9,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,364
of 240,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#68
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.