↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
39 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
474 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003815.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Esposito, Yasmin Ardebili, Helen V Worthington

Abstract

Dental implants are available in different materials, shapes and with different surface characteristics. In particular, numerous implant designs and surface modifications have been developed for improving clinical outcome. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2002, and previously updated in 2003, 2005 and 2007.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 474 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 465 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 106 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 11%
Student > Postgraduate 43 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 9%
Student > Bachelor 42 9%
Other 95 20%
Unknown 96 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 281 59%
Engineering 14 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 3%
Materials Science 11 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 32 7%
Unknown 115 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#966,281
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,908
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,298
of 239,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.