You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Number-Based Visual Generalisation in the Honeybee
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004263 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hans J. Gross, Mario Pahl, Aung Si, Hong Zhu, Jürgen Tautz, Shaowu Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 12 | 41% |
Colombia | 2 | 7% |
Chile | 2 | 7% |
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 13 | 6% |
United States | 7 | 3% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 175 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 52 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 24% |
Student > Master | 21 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 4% |
Other | 29 | 14% |
Unknown | 23 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 39% |
Psychology | 37 | 18% |
Neuroscience | 27 | 13% |
Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 22 | 11% |
Unknown | 28 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2023.
All research outputs
#735,002
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,782
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,375
of 190,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#33
of 538 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 538 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.