↓ Skip to main content

Adaptive Evolution of Staphylococcus aureus during Chronic Endobronchial Infection of a Cystic Fibrosis Patient

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adaptive Evolution of Staphylococcus aureus during Chronic Endobronchial Infection of a Cystic Fibrosis Patient
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0024301
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul R. McAdam, Anne Holmes, Kate E. Templeton, J. Ross Fitzgerald

Abstract

The molecular adaptation of Staphylococcus aureus to its host during chronic infection is not well understood. Comparative genome sequencing of 3 S. aureus isolates obtained sequentially over 26 months from the airways of a cystic fibrosis patient, revealed variation in phage content, and genetic polymorphisms in genes which influence antibiotic resistance, and global regulation of virulence. The majority of polymorphisms were isolate-specific suggesting the existence of an heterogeneous infecting population that evolved from a single infecting strain of S. aureus. The genetic variation identified correlated with differences in growth rate, hemolytic activity, and antibiotic sensitivity, implying a profound effect on the ecology of S. aureus. In particular, a high frequency of mutations in loci associated with the alternate transcription factor SigB, were observed. The identification of genes under diversifying selection during long-term infection may inform the design of novel therapeutics for the control of refractory chronic infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Denmark 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 118 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 21%
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 40%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 24 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2012.
All research outputs
#18,295,723
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,642
of 193,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,105
of 125,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,000
of 2,542 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,542 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.