↓ Skip to main content

Pixie dust

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pixie dust
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2014
DOI 10.1145/2601097.2601118
Authors

Yoichi Ochiai, Takayuki Hoshi, Jun Rekimoto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 3%
Student > Master 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 58 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 15 16%
Engineering 12 13%
Materials Science 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 60 63%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,933,082
of 16,387,457 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#160
of 1,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,883
of 195,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#9
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,387,457 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.