↓ Skip to main content

Recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis in neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis in neonates
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005385.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ranjit I Kylat, Arne Ohlsson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 132 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 19%
Student > Master 27 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 33 23%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 17 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,922,839
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,995
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,160
of 192,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.