You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patients’ experiences of using a smartphone application to increase physical activity: the SMART MOVE qualitative study in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp14x680989 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monica Casey, Patrick S Hayes, Fergus Glynn, Gearóid ÓLaighin, David Heaney, Andrew W Murphy, Liam G Glynn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 61% |
| Ireland | 2 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Scientists | 5 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 341 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 15% |
| Researcher | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 61 | 17% |
| Unknown | 59 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 13% |
| Psychology | 38 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 16% |
| Unknown | 81 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2014.
All research outputs
#2,796,418
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,285
of 4,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,524
of 230,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#15
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.