↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009076.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vrisha Madhuri, Vivek Dutt, Abhay D Gahukamble, Prathap Tharyan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Andorra 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 145 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 28%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 16%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 29 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,067,513
of 13,973,339 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,193
of 10,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,971
of 192,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,973,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.