↓ Skip to main content

Towards a New Paradigm of Non-Captive Research on Cetacean Cognition

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
56 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards a New Paradigm of Non-Captive Research on Cetacean Cognition
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0024121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lori Marino, Toni Frohoff

Abstract

Contemporary knowledge of impressive neurophysiology and behavior in cetaceans, combined with increasing opportunities for studying free-ranging cetaceans who initiate sociable interaction with humans, are converging to highlight serious ethical considerations and emerging opportunities for a new era of progressive and less-invasive cetacean research. Most research on cetacean cognition has taken place in controlled captive settings, e.g., research labs, marine parks. While these environments afford a certain amount of experimental rigor and logistical control they are fraught with limitations in external validity, impose tremendous stress on the part of the captive animals, and place burdens on populations from which they are often captured. Alternatively, over the past three decades, some researchers have sought to focus their attention on the presence of free-ranging cetacean individuals and groups who have initiated, or chosen to participate in, sociable interactions with humans in the wild. This new approach, defined as Interspecies Collaborative Research between cetacean and human, involves developing novel ways to address research questions under natural conditions and respecting the individual cetacean's autonomy. It also offers a range of potential direct benefits to the cetaceans studied, as well as allowing for unprecedented cognitive and psychological research on sociable mysticetes. Yet stringent precautions are warranted so as to not increase their vulnerability to human activities or pathogens. When conducted in its best and most responsible form, collaborative research with free-ranging cetaceans can deliver methodological innovation and invaluable new insights while not necessitating the ethical and scientific compromises that characterize research in captivity. Further, it is representative of a new epoch in science in which research is designed so that the participating cetaceans are the direct recipients of the benefits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Mexico 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 203 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 20%
Researcher 38 17%
Student > Bachelor 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Professor 16 7%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 21 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 123 56%
Environmental Science 16 7%
Psychology 15 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 27 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#320,829
of 24,520,187 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,612
of 211,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,111
of 129,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#51
of 2,560 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,560 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.