↓ Skip to main content

Toxicity potentiation by H2O2 with components of dental restorative materials on human oral cells

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toxicity potentiation by H2O2 with components of dental restorative materials on human oral cells
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00204-007-0226-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franz-Xaver Reichl, Mario Seiss, Wolfgang Marquardt, Norbert Kleinsasser, Helmut Schweikl, Kai Kehe, Reinhard Hickel

Abstract

Toxicity potentiation of two monomers [bisphenol-A-glycidyldimethacrylate (BisGMA) and urethanedimethacrylate (UDMA)] as well as two comonomers [triethyleneglycoldimethacrylate (TEGDMA) and 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA)], each in combination with H(2)O(2), was investigated on the viability on human gingival fibroblasts (HGF) and human pulpal fibroblasts (HPF). The applied concentration of H(2)O(2) was 0.06 or 0.1 mmol/l, respectively, corresponding to the EC(0) of H(2)O(2) in HGF or HPF. The cell viability was assessed by the XTT test. From this test the half maximum effect concentrations (EC(50)) were calculated from fitted sigmoidale curves. EC(50) values were (HGF; mmol/l; mean +/- s.e.m.; n = 5): HEMA 11.9 +/- 0.9, TEGDMA 3.7 +/- 0.3, H(2)O(2) 0.36 +/- 0.04, UDMA 0.27 +/- 0.08, and BisGMA 0.11 +/- 0.03. No significant (P < 0.05) differences in the EC(50) values were observed when HGF was exposed to substances, as compared to HPF. No significant decrease of the EC(50) values was found when HGF or HPF, respectively, was exposed to HEMA or BisGMA in addition with H(2)O(2) up to the concentration of 0.1 mmol/l, as compared to those EC(50) values of each compound without H(2)O(2) addition. A significant decrease of the TEGDMA EC(50) value from 3.7 to 2.1 or 0.4 mmol/l, respectively, was found when cells were exposed to TEGDMA in combination with H(2)O(2) (0.06 or 0.1 mmol/l), as compared to that TEGDMA EC(50) value without H(2)O(2) addition. A significant decrease of the UDMA EC(50) value from 0.27 to 0.11 or 0.08 mmol/l, respectively, was found when HGF or HPF was exposed to UDMA in combination with H(2)O(2) (0.06 or 0.1 mmol/l), as compared to that UDMA EC(50) value without H(2)O(2) addition. The addition of H(2)O(2) (0.06 or 0.1 mmol/l) resulted in a toxicity potentiation of TEGDMA and UDMA, but not of HEMA and BisGMA, on HGF or HPF.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 14 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 40%
Chemical Engineering 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 40%