↓ Skip to main content

A network framework of cultural history

Overview of attention for article published in Science, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
14 blogs
twitter
218 tweeters
weibo
5 weibo users
facebook
23 Facebook pages
googleplus
21 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
369 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
A network framework of cultural history
Published in
Science, July 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1240064
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Schich, C. Song, Y.-Y. Ahn, A. Mirsky, M. Martino, A.-L. Barabasi, D. Helbing

Abstract

The emergent processes driving cultural history are a product of complex interactions among large numbers of individuals, determined by difficult-to-quantify historical conditions. To characterize these processes, we have reconstructed aggregate intellectual mobility over two millennia through the birth and death locations of more than 150,000 notable individuals. The tools of network and complexity theory were then used to identify characteristic statistical patterns and determine the cultural and historical relevance of deviations. The resulting network of locations provides a macroscopic perspective of cultural history, which helps us to retrace cultural narratives of Europe and North America using large-scale visualization and quantitative dynamical tools and to derive historical trends of cultural centers beyond the scope of specific events or narrow time intervals.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 218 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 4%
Germany 8 2%
United Kingdom 7 2%
Japan 4 1%
Spain 4 1%
Denmark 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Other 18 5%
Unknown 304 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 105 28%
Researcher 77 21%
Student > Master 45 12%
Other 27 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 25 7%
Other 90 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 18%
Computer Science 52 14%
Social Sciences 42 11%
Physics and Astronomy 35 9%
Unspecified 25 7%
Other 147 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 490. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,451
of 12,358,480 outputs
Outputs from Science
#736
of 56,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222
of 195,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#22
of 885 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,358,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 885 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.