↓ Skip to main content

Community based interventions for the prevention and control of Non-Helmintic NTD

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases of Poverty, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community based interventions for the prevention and control of Non-Helmintic NTD
Published in
Infectious Diseases of Poverty, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/2049-9957-3-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jai K Das, Rehana A Salam, Ahmed Arshad, Hasina Maredia, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Abstract

In this paper, we aim to systematically analyze the effectiveness of community based interventions (CBI) for the prevention and control of non-helminthic diseases including dengue, trypanosomiasis, chagas, leishmaniasis, buruli ulcer, leprosy and trachoma. We systematically reviewed literature published up to May 2013 and included 62 studies in this review. Findings from our review suggest that CBI including insecticide spraying; insecticide treated bednets and curtains; community education and cleanliness campaigns; chemoprophylaxis through mass drug administration; and treatment have the potential to reduce the incidence and burden of non-helminthic diseases. Lack of data limited the subgroup analysis for integrated and non-integrated delivery strategies however, qualitative synthesis suggest that integrated delivery is more effective when compared to vertical interventions; however, such integration was possible only because of the existing vertical vector control programs. Community delivered interventions have the potential to achieve wider coverage and sustained community acceptance. Eradicating these diseases will require a multipronged approach including drug administration, health education, vector control and clean water and sanitation facilities. This would require high level governmental commitment along with strong partnerships among major stakeholders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 138 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 10 7%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 35 24%