You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pertussis resurgence in Toronto, Canada: a population-based study including test-incidence feedback modeling
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-694 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David N Fisman, Patrick Tang, Tanya Hauck, Susan Richardson, Steven J Drews, Donald E Low, Frances Jamieson |
Abstract |
Pertussis continues to challenge medical professionals; recently described increases in incidence may be due to age-cohort effects, vaccine effectiveness, or changes in testing patterns. Toronto, Canada has recently experienced increases in pertussis incidence, and provides an ideal jurisdiction for evaluating pertussis epidemiology due to centralized testing. We evaluated pertussis trends in Toronto using all available specimen data, which allowed us to control for changing testing patterns and practices. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 4 | 20% |
France | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 95% |
Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 21% |
Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Mathematics | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 24% |
Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,463,571
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,955
of 17,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,964
of 137,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#26
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.