↓ Skip to main content

Baby-led compared with scheduled (or mixed) breastfeeding for successful breastfeeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Baby-led compared with scheduled (or mixed) breastfeeding for successful breastfeeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009067.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fallon A, Van der Putten D, Dring C, Moylett EH, Fealy G, Devane D

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2016.
All research outputs
#941,365
of 12,607,969 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,087
of 10,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,191
of 192,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,607,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.