↓ Skip to main content

Identification of novel therapeutics for complex diseases from genome-wide association data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of novel therapeutics for complex diseases from genome-wide association data
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1755-8794-7-s1-s8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mani P Grover, Sara Ballouz, Kaavya A Mohanasundaram, Richard A George, Craig D H Sherman, Tamsyn M Crowley, Merridee A Wouters

Abstract

Human genome sequencing has enabled the association of phenotypes with genetic loci, but our ability to effectively translate this data to the clinic has not kept pace. Over the past 60 years, pharmaceutical companies have successfully demonstrated the safety and efficacy of over 1,200 novel therapeutic drugs via costly clinical studies. While this process must continue, better use can be made of the existing valuable data. In silico tools such as candidate gene prediction systems allow rapid identification of disease genes by identifying the most probable candidate genes linked to genetic markers of the disease or phenotype under investigation. Integration of drug-target data with candidate gene prediction systems can identify novel phenotypes which may benefit from current therapeutics. Such a drug repositioning tool can save valuable time and money spent on preclinical studies and phase I clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 93 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Other 10 10%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Psychology 6 6%
Computer Science 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2014.
All research outputs
#12,901,402
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#450
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,466
of 227,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.