You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comments on "Human Dominant Disease Genes Are Enriched in Paralogs Originating from Whole Genome Duplication"
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003758 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wei-Hua Chen, Xing-Ming Zhao, Vera van Noort, Peer Bork |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 17% |
Sweden | 1 | 17% |
Brazil | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 20% |
France | 1 | 10% |
Spain | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 40% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 40% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 30% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,976
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,187
of 239,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#85
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.